I hate NYT, but…

April 1, 2010 · Filed Under Social Commentary, political opinion · 3 Comments 

 

Pope Benedict XVI waves to the faithful as he leaves after his ...Apparently the New York Times has run a damaging story about the Pope and his handling of the pedophile priest that had molested 200 deaf boys.  And for doing so, the Vatican now believes itself the victim of NYT’s slanderous and biased coverage of an otherwise holy personage.

 

I actually agree with the NYT’s decision to cover this matter; indeed, I believe this to be the quintessential role of the press – to find and report when people or institutions we of necessity must trust, are abusing or otherwise not worthy of such.

Good for you, NYT.  Now if we could get you to be more consistent on other and equally important matters of national and world interest, instead of only reporting on the narrow scope of your own self-interests.

Imagine the value if we could actually trust our legacy News media institutions like the NYT to fairly report our world and not simply slam those few entities that they don’t agree with philosophically or politically. 

Imagine…

We’d know the truth about terrorism and the raging wars in Afghanistan and Iraq

We’d truly know if Iran is a nuclear threat or not.

The reason for Israeli recalcitrance in forgoing any further settlements in the west bank could be better understood.  (By the way, Hamas and Palestine might be partially to blame – every time Israel gives up land, they build missile sites on it).  And why do I know that?  A different legacy media outlet reported it.

Polling information about the Health Care Bill would be based on something besides emotion.  Indeed, why do senators care what polls think – no one knows what the bill does because media took sides.

And of course, Global Warming.  Imagine if the NYT used two columns and put pros and cons; fact and presumption, theory and emotion…  We’d know!  Indeed, we’d even care!

Its a shame.  Instead we’ll all have to keep searching for that all important balance ourselves.  The news industry is obviously too self-absorbed to care.

Anyway, we can all agree about the Catholic Church.  Media needs to shine a light in these dark and dank hallways.   Media needs to make these pedophile priests scurry like rats, so the church can some day return to its all important work of spiritual guidance.

 

Tom

Technorati Tags: ,,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Managers manage… But what!

February 26, 2010 · Filed Under Social Commentary · 3 Comments 

image Every now and then, I read something that challenges a core belief that has sat there for years, stinking up my brain cells in complacent, unchallenged squalor.

That’s why I visit my friend Rob’s blog daily.  He is quick to disabuse me of such repose.  And its not that I agree with Rob very often; because I cant say that I do… Its because he forces me to know why I don’t.

And today, he did it again.  He beset me with a conundrum that not only challenged what I do, but who I am. 

Soup bone…

Attend a snippet from the venerable Rob Patterson:

“This too is why the Manager is a dying breed too. Managers are in reality factory assembly line foremen whose job it is to meet the quota and the rules of the process. Theirs is not the job to think of new ways of doing things. Their job is to keep it all moving and the sheep from straying. But with fewer sheep, who needs the manager?

Again the biggest farce of all are all the managerial skills that are in demand. All those managers that are truly innovative get asked to leave. What is demanded is to be able to keep control.

The skill that managers need to rise, is not to have results, but to be expert politicians. Anyone who has been an outstanding manager who has constantly delivered results knows that this means little compared with others who climb over them.”

Rob postulates that this economic upheaval, together with the Web 2.0 will cause the demise of the traditional employee and attendant manager as the proper manner of things.  He believes jobs are dehumanizing, dumb us down and prevent us from reaching any true personal growth.  He poses that those in the role of manager, produce but two products:  obedience and inter-office intrigue. 

I guess its a good thing the web is here to rescue us all!

Not so fast, Rob. 

For me to accept such a notion, that employees in a workplace, led by a manager must vanish for ever more, to be replaced with laptop-brandishing consultants, all hooked together, in synergetic work nirvana, I must also assume these ideas:

 

 

Big things, such as the movie Avatar, the Hoover Dam, the 2010 Dodge Ram pickup, the next miracle cure for Cancer, the replacement to the World Trade Center, a mission to Mars, can be produced by a loosely affiliated group of fiercely independent consultants and knowledge workers, all doing their small part.

 

Governments will pass laws that reorder international commerce, such that the advancement of each person’s skills and intrinsic self-worth will take precedence over competition for market share and price.

 

  image

All people everywhere are smitten by this same sense of independence and entelechy that causes you and I to thrive on challenge and change.  No one would be satisfied as a janitor or fast food server, or a nurse’s aide.

Global and National problems like peak oil, pollution, or terrorism, are best addressed by thousands of individuals, all on their own,  with their own interests.

 

 

And now to my my  much aligned role as a Manager…  Incidentally I find it a noble profession; one worthy of me.

I enforce company policy because lawyers are constantly circling overhead…  I must ensure workers follow safety protocol, don’t create a hostile workforce, don’t  release personal information to those unauthorized, come to work on time, look and deport themselves professionally so that there is no perception of favoritism.  Some of this I do because it makes sense, a lot of it I do because my company and I can be sued if I don’t. 

-  I navigate a myriad of confusing and insurmountable rules to correct or fire recalcitrant and unprofessional workers less they spoil the rest.  I must follow a strict regimen of counseling and employee intervention;  I must do this to prevent union protests and law suits.

-  Despite an assertion that managers force compliance…  I must not merely cajole and bully, but must inspire and foster great customer service in my workforce.  For jointly, our livelihoods depend on it!

   I must always be vigilant for better and more efficient ways to add value to my customer so they see us as “team  players”; again to perpetuate our existence.

-  I review and revise so-called “dehumanizing” processes in an attempt to reduce accidents, and repeatable service misses because both can get us fired as a service provider.

-  I and my ilk, work as long and as hard as it takes to make sure the people we are charged to lead, have work tomorrow, next week, next month.   I spend hours staring at the P&L; looking for savings without cutting labor.

-  I spend absolutely no time honing or practicing my obedience skills or hovering in doorways attempting to catch a bit of gossip.  Those who do, I have no time for, nor any respect for.

Rob, many of us do not consult, but instead, we “do”.  We don’t always enjoy some of the things we must do, but understand that great things; complex things, culture-changing things are done by people, who must be assimilated into a group so that their special contributions can be harvested.  

Rob, I truly thank you for stirring the pot one more time!  It is a consultant’s quintessential skill and one that we, who are in line management, require to refresh our notions of what we are about.   In your defense, I might advance that the manager and employee you speak of – one given largely to the ignoble side of management,  is alive and well in government and large bureaucracies.  In my 30 years in government, I can assure you – it was all about intrigue, obedience and nothing to do with adding value or humanity.

Awesome job, Rob – and mission accomplished.

Tom

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

I’m sorry, no really!

February 26, 2010 · Filed Under Social Commentary, patriotism · Comment 

 

Absolutely deplorable.  Imagine your little snowflake, refusing to cite the Pledge of Allegiance in class, and somehow this might cause an issue.  Shouldn’t we just let it be!

Imagine how traumatic for this little one, when the refusal resulted in undue attention.

Imagine that this child, all by herself,  thought up this whole notion that she must refuse to honor the country that gives her sustenance.  Imagine that it was the school system and not her parents that threw this 13 year old under the bus and “scarred her for life”.

Imagine there might be a blood sucking lawyer at the end of this whole victimhood scheme?

attend.

image

ook.  Since this teacher was no doubt insincere – no doubt real pig headed about this whole issue, let me apologize on behalf of all of us! 

Dear much abused parent and snowflake.  We’re so sorry.  And as a token of our utter shame and contrition, please accept this coupon; with all due humility we hope it helps whisk you away to another country, another life – no doubt better than this one!  For truly, we’re not worthy of you!

image

No really – we’re all real sorry and stuff!

 

Tom

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Next Page »


Subscribe